Once the above problem is sorted out, here is a prescription for calculating R'HK:
(1) Calculate an S value
- defined based on the operation of the Mount Wilson spectrometers (Duncan et al. 1991)
- R and V channels are 20A wide centered on 4001.07A and 3901.07A (in the star's frame) respectively
- H and K channels are triangular with the FWHM =1.09A
- S=alpha*(H+K)/(R+V), alpha = 2.4
(2) Calculate R_HK from S and B-V (Middelkoop 1982)
\[C=1.13(B-V)^3 - 3.91(B-V)^2 + 2.84(B-V) - 0.47\]
\[R_{HK} = 1.34\times10^{-4}\times C \times S\]
\[C=1.13(B-V)^3 - 3.91(B-V)^2 + 2.84(B-V) - 0.47\]
\[R_{HK} = 1.34\times10^{-4}\times C \times S\]
(3) Make a photometric correction to get R'_HK
\[logR_{phot} = -4.898 + 1.918(B-V)^2 - 2.893(B-V)^3
\]
\[R'_{HK} = R_{HK} - R_{phot}\]
Now, I have had some trouble plotting my spectra in Python (the headers seem to be screwed up so that when I plot the spectra, the x-axis doesn't have the wavelength solution applied and the spectra seems to only reach the peak of the blaze profile). But maybe I can get around this:
The equivalent width tells you (in a round-about way) the flux inside some rectangle centered on the line in question. If you normalize that by the width of a rectangular bandpass to account for the continuum, you should get the same units (and the same physical measurement) as if you had calculated R'HK. There should be a straight-foward constant correction factor one could apply to transform that number into an R'HK. More to come...
\[logR_{phot} = -4.898 + 1.918(B-V)^2 - 2.893(B-V)^3
\]
\[R'_{HK} = R_{HK} - R_{phot}\]
Now, I have had some trouble plotting my spectra in Python (the headers seem to be screwed up so that when I plot the spectra, the x-axis doesn't have the wavelength solution applied and the spectra seems to only reach the peak of the blaze profile). But maybe I can get around this:
The equivalent width tells you (in a round-about way) the flux inside some rectangle centered on the line in question. If you normalize that by the width of a rectangular bandpass to account for the continuum, you should get the same units (and the same physical measurement) as if you had calculated R'HK. There should be a straight-foward constant correction factor one could apply to transform that number into an R'HK. More to come...
No comments:
Post a Comment